The Supreme Court has yet again let the establishment off the hook, refusing to block Special Counsel Jack Smith’s deep dive into Donald Trump’s private messages on Twitter, now rebranded as X. In typical fashion, the court declined to provide any explanation, leaving us all wondering just how much oversight really exists when it comes to protecting American citizens—especially when that citizen is Donald Trump.
Let’s take a step back. The Department of Justice (DOJ) first came knocking back in January last year, demanding every ounce of digital dirt they could dig up on Trump, from his search history to his direct messages and account settings under the infamous “@realDonaldTrump” handle. They even wanted information on his activity! And to keep things extra shady, the government got a nondisclosure order to prevent X from even telling Trump about the warrant. How convenient.
X, to its credit, did fight back, claiming the records might be protected by executive privilege and that the government’s gag order was a First Amendment violation. But in true bureaucratic fashion, the government didn’t care and fined the company $350,000 when it didn’t cough up Trump’s data fast enough. Imagine the uproar if this was done to, say, Obama—oh, wait, it wouldn’t be done to Obama because the double standard is alive and well.
Now, here’s where things get even more sinister. After losing in the lower courts, Trump’s team tried one last time to get the Supreme Court to rein in Smith’s relentless spying campaign. And what did the justices do? They quietly slammed the door shut on Trump’s challenge. No explanations, no accountability. Just business as usual.
Smith’s investigation is, of course, linked to the Capitol riot on January 6, 2021. He’s been after Trump ever since that day, determined to drag out legal battles and bog him down in courtrooms rather than the Oval Office. A month before Election Day, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan finally unsealed Smith’s 165-page report, which outlines the so-called “evidence” against Trump. But the timing of this move isn’t suspicious at all, right? Nothing screams “impartial justice” like unsealing key documents right before voters head to the polls.
Elon Musk, the CEO of X, stood by Trump during a campaign event in Butler, Pennsylvania, warning that if Kamala Harris wins the next election, “this will be the last election.” Musk’s not exactly wrong, either. The government’s grip on free speech, especially after the Supreme Court’s refusal to rein in the censorship-industrial complex, has tightened over the years. And you can bet if Trump doesn’t win in 2024, that grip will only get stronger.
Musk, the world’s richest billionaire, has already made waves by donating tens of millions to conservative causes and overhauling X as a platform for free speech. Yet the left still tries to paint him as the bad guy. Funny how that works, isn’t it? When a tech mogul leans left, they’re a “visionary,” but when they start advocating for free speech and backing conservative values, they suddenly become a “threat to democracy.”
Smith’s 165-page report is nothing more than another hit piece. It’s like the Democrats pulled out the old playbook from 2017 when they started plotting Trump’s first impeachment on day one of his presidency. Now, they’re trying to set the stage for a third impeachment with yet another baseless dossier. But they’re not stopping there. Even if Trump wins reelection, he’ll be stepping into a second term already buried under a mountain of criminal charges, thanks to overzealous prosecutors from Manhattan who’ve managed to slap him with dozens of felony convictions.
But this is all just a coincidence, right? Nothing to see here—just the same old political witch hunts disguised as justice. If there’s one thing clear from all of this, it’s that the establishment will stop at nothing to prevent Trump from reclaiming the White House. The real question is whether the American people will let them get away with it.
